<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kino Reticulator &#187; Idiot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kino.reticulator.com/category/idiot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kino.reticulator.com</link>
	<description>Superficial comments about movies (mostly Russian ones) and languages</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 04:18:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Forgive us our happiness</title>
		<link>http://kino.reticulator.com/2009/11/17/forgive-us-our-happiness/</link>
		<comments>http://kino.reticulator.com/2009/11/17/forgive-us-our-happiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reticulator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Idiot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kino.reticulator.com/2009/11/17/forgive-us-our-happiness/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not easy to follow the part of the series with Ipollit, partly because I haven&#8217;t read the book, and partly because his is not a type we have in our society. He is as self-absorbed as the worst of us baby boomers, but even more of a drama queen. He&#8217;s supposed to be dying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgO5wrUgNoU&#038;feature=related"><img height="321" alt="idiot-die-8" hspace="5" src="http://kino.reticulator.com/j/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/idiot-die-8-small.jpg" width="500" vspace="5" /></a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not easy to follow the part of the series with Ipollit, partly because I haven&#8217;t read the book, and partly because his is not a type we have in our society.  He is as self-absorbed as the worst of us baby boomers, but even more of a drama queen.    He&#8217;s supposed to be dying of what seems to be tuburculosis, though that word isn&#8217;t used.  Neither he nor the people around him have heard the government regulations about swine flu and how it&#8217;s important to cover your coughs, stay away from people when you&#8217;re coughing, wash your hands, etc. </p>
<p>I thought about him when I read this Mary Gordon essay at <a href="http://killingthebuddha.com/mag/exegesis/prodigal-son/">Killing the Buddha</a> about the Prodigal Son (which I found via <a href="http://www.aldaily.com/">Arts &amp; Letters Daily</a>).  It has to do with the difficulty the older son has in celebrating the younger son&#8217;s return, especially when there is some question whether the kid has really learned his lesson and is repentant.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgO5wrUgNoU&#038;feature=related"><img height="320" alt="idiot-8-5" hspace="5" src="http://kino.reticulator.com/j/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/idiot-8-5-small.jpg" width="500" vspace="5" /></a></p>
<p>In answer to Ipollit&#8217;s question of what&#8217;s the most virtuous way for him to die (he seems determined to make a grand spectacle of it) Prince Mushkin says, &#8220;You should pass us by and forgive us our happiness.&#8221;   I don&#8217;t know what Ipollit does with that advice &#8212; haven&#8217;t yet got that far.  But it didn&#8217;t seem to be the answer he wanted.</p>
<p>What this scene inspired me to do is to finally look for the <a href="http://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/?????_(???????????)/?????_I/?????_I">Russian text</a> on line in a printable version, and an English translation to go with it.  I&#8217;ve printed the first chapter.  Now to try to slog through it.   It&#8217;ll take a while.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kino.reticulator.com/2009/11/17/forgive-us-our-happiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inna Mikhailovna Churikova</title>
		<link>http://kino.reticulator.com/2009/11/16/inna-mikhailovna-churikova/</link>
		<comments>http://kino.reticulator.com/2009/11/16/inna-mikhailovna-churikova/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reticulator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Idiot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inna Mikhailovna Churikova]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oleg Basilashvili]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kino.reticulator.com/2009/11/16/inna-mikhailovna-churikova/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t normally care much for movies about the lives and manners of aristocratic families. But this family in Idiot is fun to watch. I&#8217;m not sure how much of the credit should go to Dostoevsky and how much to the filmmakers, but together they made these people interesting. It isn&#8217;t just the individuals, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center">
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk-9OCZKvtk"><img height="317" alt="idiot8b" hspace="5" src="http://kino.reticulator.com/j/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/idiot8b-small.jpg" width="500" vspace="5" /></a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk-9OCZKvtk"></a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t normally care much for movies about the lives and manners of aristocratic families. But this family in <em>Idiot</em> is fun to watch. I&#8217;m not sure how much of the credit should go to Dostoevsky and how much to the filmmakers, but together they made these people interesting.  It isn&#8217;t just the individuals, but the inter-generational interactions that draw us in.   There is some of your typical youthful rebellion, but the whole of the relationship between parents and children goes a lot deeper than that.  </p>
<p>In this scene, General Yepanchin (nicely played by Oleg Basilashvili) while not clueless, is also not quick to understand what&#8217;s happening with his daughter.   His wife, played by Inna Mikhailovna Churikova, is trying to signal him behind her back not to take her reaction wrongly.  </p>
<p>Churikova&#8217;s character is one of several highlights of this TV series.   She&#8217;s made up to look like a severe aristocratic mother, and has moments when she does indeed act the part of a domineering matriarch.  But even when she does she&#8217;s an instant away from being as childlike (in many ways) as Prince Myshkin had judged her to be.  This is definitely not a stereotypical role.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kino.reticulator.com/2009/11/16/inna-mikhailovna-churikova/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
