<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kino Reticulator &#187; Russia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kino.reticulator.com/category/russia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kino.reticulator.com</link>
	<description>Superficial comments about movies (mostly Russian ones) and languages</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 04:18:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Kin-Dza-Dza</title>
		<link>http://kino.reticulator.com/2008/02/02/kin-dza-dza/</link>
		<comments>http://kino.reticulator.com/2008/02/02/kin-dza-dza/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reticulator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrei Tarkovsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgi Daneliya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kin-dza-dza]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reticulator.com/2008/02/02/kin-dza-dza/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a movie that goes Andrei Tarkovsky&#8217;s Solaris one better. Solaris itself was somewhat of a reaction against Stanley Kubrick&#8217;s 2001: A Space Odyssey. 2001 featured gleaming high-tech on a massive scale. In Solaris, the space vehicle is somewhat run down and the protagonist goes around in a soiled shirt. But that&#8217;s nothing compared to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="http://www.reticulator.com/j/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/kino10.jpg" alt="Kino10" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="343" height="531" /></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a movie that goes Andrei Tarkovsky&#8217;s <em>Solaris</em> one better.   <em>Solaris</em> itself was somewhat of a reaction against Stanley Kubrick&#8217;s <em>2001: A Space Odyssey</em>.  <em>2001</em> featured gleaming high-tech on a massive scale.  In <em>Solaris</em>, the space vehicle is somewhat run down and the protagonist goes around in a soiled shirt.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s nothing compared to Kin-dza-dza, which came out in Russia in 1986.   Two of the interplanetary space travelers are pictured above.  (It&#8217;s a photo of the VHS cover.  I cobbed it from Wikipedia.)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reticulator.com/j/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/kindzadzaspaceship.jpg"><img src="http://www.reticulator.com/j/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/kindzadzaspaceship-small.jpg" alt="KinDzaDzaSpaceship" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="450" height="328" /></a></p>
<p>And here is their spacecraft.  (Photo cobbed from the same source as the above one.)  It&#8217;s a creaky rattle-trap rustbucket, but it does work.</p>
<p>This movie isn&#8217;t on Netflix.  There is no official English-language subtitled version.   But it&#8217;s on YouTube, with subtitles, in 14 parts.   I happened upon it last night.  I haven&#8217;t nearly finished watching.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a big science fiction fan, but small doses like this are great.  It&#8217;s had me laughing. Wikipedia says it&#8217;s somewhat of an allegory of Soviet society, but somehow made it past the censors anyway.  I don&#8217;t know about that &#8212; maybe it applies to tourist behavior and social relationships in general.   Whatever it is, it&#8217;s fun to watch.</p>
<p>Here, for my convenience and that of anyone else who cares, are links to all 14 of the segments.  It can be somewhat of a nuisance to find them in order using YouTube&#8217;s search.</p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=wOTcQGqxALA">Part 1 (1 of 7)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=BABFQkeDCc8">Part 1 (2 of 7)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=OXphPXAyGUQ">Part 1 (3 of 7)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=RSGM0vIhbCA">Part 1 (4 of 7)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=ih_REKWIfao">Part 1 (5 of 7)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=xjfV7ONK4k0">Part 1 (6 of 7)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=5trpaF0WReE">Part 1 (7 of 7)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=EAG8G2yl9ds">Part 2 (1 of 7</a>)</li>
<li><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=pg5Rc-97j7Y">Part 2 (2 of 7)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=PTiSY4MN9q8">Part 2 (3 of 7)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=4z6gK1Z2AWo">Part 2 (4 of 7)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=zX8meJ9J5gc">Part 2 (5 of 7)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=ARMs817_GB0">Part 2 (6 of 7)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=Bx7-pYmm8fE">Part 2 (7 of 7)</a></li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kino.reticulator.com/2008/02/02/kin-dza-dza/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ubiquitous national symbols</title>
		<link>http://kino.reticulator.com/2007/11/07/ubiquitous-national-symbols/</link>
		<comments>http://kino.reticulator.com/2007/11/07/ubiquitous-national-symbols/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 00:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reticulator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrei Tarkovsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katok i skripka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reticulator.com/2007/11/07/ubiquitous-national-symbols/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s WSJ told about the new CCTV building now under construction in China. It will be the 2nd largest office building in the world, after the Pentagon. I wonder if it will become a ubiquitous symbol of China. If so, that will be some interesting symbolism &#8212; a communications building as national symbol of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="http://www.reticulator.com/j/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/nuchin12.jpg" alt="nuchin12" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="350" height="360" /></p>
<p>Today&#8217;s <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119438152241184281.html?mod=world_news_featured_articles" target="_blank">WSJ told about </a> the new CCTV building now under construction in China.  It will be the 2nd largest office building in the world, after the Pentagon.</p>
<p>I wonder if it will become a ubiquitous symbol of China.  If so, that will be some interesting symbolism &#8212; a communications building as national symbol of a country that tries hard to restrict certain types of communication.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.reticulator.com/j/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/viewonrussianministryofforeignaffairsmuildingmoscowrussia2003-05-09.jpg"><img src="http://www.reticulator.com/j/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/viewonrussianministryofforeignaffairsmuildingmoscowrussia2003-05-09-small.jpg" alt="ViewOnRussianMinistryOfForeignAffairsMuilding,Moscow,Russia,2003-05-09" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="450" height="337" /></a></p>
<p>Another country with a ubiquitous building as national symbol is Russia.  The Foreign Ministry Building is everywhere.  This photo of it is from Wikipedia.   It&#8217;s also in the standard intro scenes on Mosfilm DVDs:</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.reticulator.com/j/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/logo-mosfilm.jpg" alt="Logo mosfilm" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="350" height="260" /></p>
<p>It&#8217;s shown on the background of some of RTR Planeta&#8217;s news broadcasts.  Somewhere on my desk was a candy wrapper for one of the Red October brand of candies.  It pictured the Foreign Ministry building.  (The wrapper still may be on my desk, but I may never know for sure.)  One sees it in movies whenever there&#8217;s an excuse to show it, such as in Tarkovsky&#8217;s graduation project, &#8220;Steamroller and Violin&#8221;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting that a country would use a foreign ministry building as such an important symbol.  Here in the U.S. the State Department building gets no such status.  For us, the U.S. Congress is more of a symbol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kino.reticulator.com/2007/11/07/ubiquitous-national-symbols/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
