I don’t expect Cargo 200 to be given the sort of review that Sophie Scholl, Die Letzten Tage got in Christianity Today, or which Rod Dreher over at CrunchyCon gave to Ostrov. Pastors are not going to work it into their newsletter messages and encourage their parishioners to watch it. Not when it gets reviews like this:

Aleksei Balabanov’s brutal, fetid vision of personal sadism and political policy intermingled is the only work of serious, modern social criticism in recent memory that actually made me want to puke. This is a compliment of the highest order.

That only begins to describe how disgusting it is. There are parts of it I still haven’t made myself watch a 2nd time. (It’s harder, now that I know what’s coming.) But there are overtly religious parts at the beginning and end to make one think.

The one at the beginning helps set the stage. It’s a vodka-fueled disagreement about the existence of God, with an unreformed sexual abuser of young girls who is also a convicted murderer taking the side of God’s existence.

A spoiler follows. If you want to watch the film first, go here:

The surprise is not too far from the end end, where one of the characters goes to a church and asks about the procedure for christening. An old woman tells him it’s not a procedure, it’s a ceremony. And then she tells him that while he waits for the Father he should sit over there and pray. And he goes and sits down.

There’s not a lot more than that to it. One isn’t sure if he’s still running from his responsibilities and the filth of his world, or whether he’s now headed in a new direction. If he is, it’s the only hopeful moment in the whole film. But there is reasonable doubt even about that.

Back to procedure vs ceremony. I wonder what the Russian words that are translated that way mean. Is the woman telling him something like, “It’s not a rite, it’s a sacrament?” Is procedure something people do vs ceremony being something God does?

At the beginning we are told that the film is based on true events. I wish I knew more about the true event behind this part of the story.

(I just now removed some of the details to make this a bit less of a spoiler than it was.)

 

criminalpolice

Here is the scene from Mesto Vstrechi Izmenit’ Nel’zya where the argument takes place over whether it’s OK for cops to break the law in pursuit of the bad guys. The Sharapov character pictured here says, “If we break the law once, then once again, if we use it to bridge the gaps in our investigations, it won’t be a law anymore. It will be a bludgeon.”

BTW, it’s interesting that as the argument gets heated between Sharapov and the character played by Vladimir Vysotsky, that Vysotsky’s voice becomes more like the voice he uses in his singing. You can google for YouTube videos of it. I decided to learn more about him after watching this series. But that’s not where I’m going right now.

After watching Mesto Vstrechi a few days ago, I watched Cargo 200 (Gruz 200). That turned out to be a difficult, sickening film to watch. It was even more difficult to make myself watch some of it a second time. There are other parts of it I want to go back to watch again, but so far I haven’t had the stomach for it. But it’s an important film. It shows what kind of society you have when Sharapov’s prediction comes to pass. I’ll have more to say about this one.

© 2012 Kino Reticulator Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha
Easy AdSense by Unreal